Reference
Slot RTP, as the providers publish it
Return figures for 644 titles, read from the game studio's own page, dated on the day we read it, and priced in what they cost per $100 staked. 0 of those titles are published at more than one setting, which is the part a single number cannot tell you.
Written and reviewed by Alexander Korsager · last reviewed September 29, 2026 · corrections
Find a title
Type a game's name, exactly as the studio spells it or close to it.
A slot's RTP is the share of everything staked on it that the game is built to return over millions of spins. It is a property of the game, not a forecast of your session, and it is calculated on turnover rather than on what you deposited. Both of those get lost when the figure is quoted on its own, and the second one is what makes a number in the high nineties read as harmless.
What the figure costs, per $100 staked
An RTP of 96.00% means the game is built to keep $4.00 of every $100 staked. Staked, not deposited. A $100 bankroll played at $1 a spin for 300 spins puts $300 through the game, so the same figure implies about $12.00 in expected cost rather than $4.00, and a session that keeps going until the money is gone stakes more than that again.
Over a single session the expected figure is also the least useful one: the spread around it is far wider than the average, which is why the same game can return a win one night and nothing the next. The slot simulator shows that distribution for a chosen RTP and volatility, and risk of ruin prices how long a bankroll lasts against it. This page is the input to those, not a substitute for them.
The same figure is what House Edge Comparison asks for, or prints as its own result. Check a real published setting here before typing a guess into it.
The catalogue
one studios, 644 titles, every figure linked back to the page it was read from. Last read September 29, 2026.
If you know the game but not the studio
The letter ranges below are the same in both catalogues, so a title beginning with G is under G to L in whichever one made it.
| Titles beginning | Pragmatic Play |
|---|---|
| 0 to B | 108 titles |
| C to F | 135 titles |
| G to L | 138 titles |
| M to R | 101 titles |
| S to T | 112 titles |
| U to Z | 50 titles |
How this is kept honest
Every figure is read off the provider's own page by a script, never from another reference site and never from an aggregator. Each row carries the page it came from and the date it was read, so a reader who wants to check one is a click away from the source rather than from us.
A record that stops confirming is removed on the next run rather than kept with its old date. That rule is the whole design: a reference whose timestamps keep moving while its numbers quietly stop being checked is worse than no reference at all, because it holds on to its authority long after it stops earning it. For the same reason the pipeline refuses to write anything when a provider's pages stop parsing wholesale, since a studio changing its page layout and a studio retiring its catalogue look identical from the outside and only one of them should empty a page.
What this page claims is exactly what it can support: this is the figure the provider published, here is where, here is when we looked. It is not called verified, we have not tested any of these games, and a provider republishing a different number tomorrow would make this page wrong until the next run catches it.
Which studios we read, and why two are missing
Before a provider is read at all, their terms are located and read and their robots file checked, and the result is recorded here either way. two of the four below are not read, because no terms document could be found anywhere on their sites, and one of them publishes exactly the kind of multi-setting disclosure this page is built around. Not finding a prohibition and confirming there is none are different findings, and only the second one is permission.
Play'n GO was read under exactly that check, and is listed below anyway, because a provider can also stop being readable after the fact: the pages this pipeline confirmed figures from have since been taken down or emptied by the provider itself. Nothing attributed to that provider appears anywhere else on this reference once that happens; the row below records what changed and when, rather than the entry simply disappearing with no account of why.
Reading is rate limited to one page a second per site, identifies itself in the user agent, and honors robots.txt. Each check is re-read on a cadence rather than once, and the pipeline stops fetching a provider whose check has gone stale.
| Provider | Read | What the check found |
|---|---|---|
| Pragmatic Playchecked September 14, 2026 | Yes | The terms restrict automation aimed at their games and services, not reading their public web pages, so they do not prohibit what this pipeline does. They do restrict reproducing the site, which is why this reference publishes the figure, the source link and the date rather than any part of their pages. Their terms. |
| Play'n GOchecked September 14, 2026 | No | Included from 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-07. The terms have not changed, but the pages this pipeline read figures from no longer carry them: the additional-game-content sitemap entries are gone, the old content path now returns a 308 to the homepage instead of a figure, and a live game page (verified against playngo.com/games/1001-mystery-genie-fortunes on 2026-10-07) returns 200 with no RTP data anywhere in the markup. No replacement path was found: playngo.com/robots.txt disallows /api/, so an API-served replacement, if one exists, is not ours to read. #1451 has the full verification. Their terms. |
| Hacksaw Gamingchecked September 14, 2026 | No | No terms of use could be located: not in the site footer, not in the sitemap, and not at any of the usual paths. Their robots file permits everything, but silence in a robots file is not a terms check, so this provider is not fetched. This is the conservative half of the rule and it costs real coverage: their pages publish up to four return settings per title. |
| Thunderkickchecked September 14, 2026 | No | A privacy policy is published; no terms of use could be located at any path or in the footer. A privacy policy governs what they do with a visitor's data and says nothing about automated access, so it is not the document this check needs and cannot stand in for it. |
What this does not cover
644 titles from one studios is a start rather than a category. A slot from any other studio is missing here, and missing means we have not read it, not that its figures are unknown or disputed. The next studios to add are the ones that pass the check above, which is a question about their terms rather than about their catalogue.
It is also not filtered by game type. Where a studio publishes a return figure for something that is not a slot, a blackjack or roulette title for instance, it is listed here as published. The studios do not state a category on these pages, and inventing one the source does not give is how a reference starts making things up. A title published with no return figure at all is simply absent, which is most of what is missing from a studio's catalogue here.
Before you use any of this
A higher return figure is still a negative expectation. Every game on this page is built to keep a share of everything staked on it, and no combination of settings on this page turns that around. Nothing here is a way to get ahead of a game. 21+, and only where regulated. The National Problem Gambling Helpline is free, confidential and open 24/7, call or text 1-800-MY-RESET (1-800-697-3738), or chat at ncpgambling.org/chat. More on staying in control.