Round Robin Calculator
Price every card a round robin can settle into, and the number of legs it needs before it pays for itself. Also prices the UK full-cover reading: 3 doubles, 1 treble and 3 up-and-downs on exactly 3 selections.
This prices a round robin you can already see, at the prices you enter, treating the selections as independent. Whether those selections are worth backing is the input you bring.
1. Build the ticket
Every price field reads an American price (+150). Switch the format above to enter prices the way your book quotes them, or open the odds converter to see one price in all of them.
One leg short of a perfect card, on a $60.00 ticket of 6 parlays
$109.34
back on the $60.00 this ticket costs, if exactly one leg misses
3 of 4 legs have to land before the ticket hands back what it cost. 65% of cards finish at or below the outlay, and 28% return nothing at all.
Typical card
$36.45
back on $60.00
2. Choose the parlays, then miss a leg
Which selections land
Tap a selection to miss it. A parlay pays only if every selection on it lands.
By 2s: 3 of 6 paying
With 3 of 4 landing
3 of 6
parlays paying
This card returns
$109.34
up $49.34 on the $60.00 outlay
Every card, by how many selections land
- Legs: 4 of 4Chance 7.5%Parlays won 6/6
Returns $218.68
Profit up $158.68
- Legs: 3 of 4set aboveChance 27%Parlays won 3/6
Returns $109.34
Profit up $49.34
- Legs: 2 of 4Chance 37%Parlays won 1/6
Returns $36.45
Profit down $23.55
- Legs: 1 of 4Chance 23%Parlays won 0/6
Returns $0.00
Profit down $60.00
- Legs: 0 of 4Chance 5.1%Parlays won 0/6
Returns $0.00
Profit down $60.00
Each bar is what the card returns, on a scale that ends at the perfect card. The line across it is the $60.00 outlay.
Perfect card
$218.68
Cards that profit
35%
Cards that return nothing
28%
The same $60.00 on one 4-leg parlay instead
| Round robin | Straight parlay | |
|---|---|---|
| Legs needed for anything back | 2 of 4 | 4 of 4 |
| Chance of any return | 72% | 7.5% |
| Best case | $218.68 | $797.00 |
This is the trade the format makes, at the same money: the round robin wins something far more often and its best case is much smaller. Where you have entered fair odds, the last row is the part most tellings of this get backwards. Each parlay on a round robin has fewer legs than the straight parlay, so it carries the margin fewer times, which means the round robin usually holds less per dollar. What it costs you is the ceiling, not the edge.
The figure the bet slip shows
- Parlays
- 6
- Total stake
- $60.00
- On a perfect card
- $218.68
A slip prints the number of parlays, the total stake and what a perfect card pays. That last figure is correct and it is the one card a round robin is not bought for. 27% of what this ticket returns on average is carried by that single card.
Carried by the perfect card
27%
Every figure here is enumerated over all 16 ways your 4 selections can settle, so there is no simulation, no seed and no sampling error to declare. Each leg is taken at the chance its own price implies, which makes every parlay break even on average and is the optimistic case. See how this is calculated, below.
Every figure here treats the selections as independent. Round robins are commonly built from legs in the same game, where that is false: correlated legs land together more often than these prices imply, and the returns above are optimistic in a way this page cannot measure for you.
Written and reviewed by Alexander Korsager · last reviewed October 6, 2026 · corrections
The idea
What this tool shows
A round robin is not a bet type with a price of its own. It is a shorthand for buying every combination of a chosen size out of a set of selections, and paying for each one separately. Four selections taken by 2s is six two-leg parlays, so at $10 a parlay the ticket costs $60, not $10. That multiplication is the first thing people get wrong about the format.
The second thing is what the ticket is worth when it half works, and it is the reason this page exists.A round robin is sold as protection against one selection missing, which makes the interesting question not the payout on a perfect card but what comes back on the card you actually bought it for. At four legs of -110 by 2s, three correct legs return $109.34 on that $60, and two correct legs return $36.45: a card that got half its selections right hands back 61 cents on the dollar.
So the number this page leads with is the one no bet slip prints: how many legs have to land before the ticket returns what it cost.Everything else follows from it. Where your prices differ from leg to leg, which legs land matters as well as how many, and the table keeps that as a range rather than averaging a loss and a profit into one figure.
Nothing here is simulated.With eight selections there are 256 ways the card can settle, and the return in each of them is a sum of the prices you entered, so the whole distribution is enumerated rather than sampled. There is no trial count, no seed and no sampling error to declare.
The last panel is the comparison the format is chosen on: the same money on one straight parlay over all the legs.The round robin wins something far more often and its best case is much smaller, which is the trade most people expect. The part most tellings get backwards is the margin, and the tool shows it against your own fair prices: each parlay on a round robin has fewer legs than the straight parlay, so it carries the bookmaker margin fewer times and usually holds less per dollar. What a round robin costs you is the ceiling, not the edge.
The term collides with itself across the Atlantic, and the two tickets are different bets rather than two readings of one.A US book's round robin is the combination reading above: every C(n,k) parlay of a chosen size, generalizing to any leg count. A UK bookmaker's round robin means a fixed structure on exactly 3 selections: 3 doubles, 1 treble, and 3 up-and-down pairs (also called Single Stakes About), 10 bets in total. An up-and-down is not a plain single: it stakes on one selection, and if that selection wins, the original stake amount (not the return) goes on as a fresh single on the other. That conditional staking is why a lone winner does not clear its pair's outlay until its price reaches 3.00, and why the two readings are not the same bet with different names.
FAQ
Questions players ask
How many parlays does a round robin make?
It is the number of combinations of your selections at the size you picked, written C(n,k). Four selections by 2s is six parlays, five by 2s is ten, six by 2s is fifteen, and five by 3s is ten. A mixed ticket adds the sizes together, so four selections by 2s and by 3s is six doubles plus four trebles, ten parlays in all. Your total stake is the stake per parlay multiplied by that count, which is why a $10 round robin is rarely a $10 bet.
How many legs have to win for a round robin to break even?
That depends on your prices and the combination size, and it is the figure this page leads with. At four selections of -110 by 2s it is three of four: two correct legs win one parlay out of six and return $36.45 against a $60 outlay. The count always exists and is never worse than every leg landing, because every parlay is priced above 1, so a perfect card always returns more than the ticket cost. Where your prices differ between legs, the page shows two readings: the count at which every card breaks even, and the count at which the best card does.
Is a round robin better than a parlay?
They are different shapes rather than one being better. At the same total stake the round robin returns something far more often and its best case is much smaller, so it trades ceiling for frequency. On expected value the round robin usually holds less per dollar, because each of its parlays has fewer legs and so carries the bookmaker margin fewer times: four legs shaded 4.5% each cost 8.9% of the outlay taken by 2s and 17.0% taken as one four-leg parlay. Neither figure is positive at real prices, and spreading a losing set of selections across more parlays does not make it a winning bet.
Can a round robin lose money when most of my picks win?
Yes, and it is the most common way the format surprises people. Only the parlays made up entirely of winning selections pay, so a card that is short of perfect pays out on a fraction of the ticket. Six selections by 2s at -110 is fifteen parlays, $150 at $10 each: three correct legs win three of those parlays and return $109.34, and it takes four of the six to get the outlay back. At shorter prices it is worse, and a majority-correct card can lose: five selections at -200 by 2s need four of five, so three correct legs return $67.50 on a $100 ticket. The table on this page prints those rows for your own numbers rather than leaving them to be worked out.
What does a round robin cost me if my selections are correlated?
More than this page can show you. Every figure here treats the selections as independent, and round robins are frequently built from legs in the same game, where that is false. Correlated legs land together more often than their prices imply, which makes the middle rows of the table optimistic. The page states the assumption rather than burying it, because the difference is not a rounding detail on a ticket built out of one game.
Does a bigger combination size protect me better?
It does the opposite. A larger size means each parlay needs more of your selections, so more legs have to land before anything pays, and the margin compounds further on each ticket. Taking four selections by 3s rather than by 2s cuts the parlay count from six to four, raises the number of legs needed for a return from two to three, and lowers the expected return per dollar. The smaller sizes are what buy the frequency; the larger ones buy the ceiling.
What is a UK round robin, and is it the same bet as the US one?
No, and the shared name is the whole trap. A UK bookmaker's round robin is a fixed 10-bet ticket on exactly 3 selections: 3 doubles, 1 treble, and 3 up-and-down pairs. An up-and-down (Single Stakes About) is not a plain single: it stakes on one selection, and if that selection wins, the original stake, not the return, goes on as a fresh single on the other selection in the pair. A US round robin generalizes to any number of selections and any combination size, with no conditional staking at all. This calculator prices both, as two separate modes, because the same three words describe two different bet slips depending on which side of the Atlantic wrote them.
Does one winning selection guarantee a return on a UK round robin?
It guarantees something comes back, but usually not the outlay. The two up-and-down pairs touching a lone winner always pay, because each starts with an unconditional single on that selection. What they do not always cover is what those two pairs risked: a lone winner clears their combined outlay only once its price reaches 3.00. At evens (2.00) it returns half of it. "A winner guarantees a return" is the format's own standard selling line and it is true, so read the figures this calculator prints against the outlay, not against zero.
Methodology
How this is calculated
The ticket is built as every combination of the chosen sizes: for n selections and size k that is C(n,k) parlays, summed over the sizes selected, and the total outlay is the stake per parlay times that count. Each parlay's price is the product of its legs' decimal odds.
Every figure on the page then comes out of one enumeration: with n selections there are 2 to the power n ways the card can settle, n is capped at 8, and for each of those 256 or fewer cards a parlay pays exactly when all of its legs are among the ones that landed.
The return on a card is the sum over the paying parlays, and the chance of that card is the product of the per-leg chances, taken from each price where you have not entered fair odds and from your fair odds where you have.
Grouping those cards by how many legs landed gives the table, and because a leg landing can only add paying parlays and never remove one, the return at j correct legs is never below the return at j minus 1: that is what makes the break-even leg count a threshold rather than one row's coincidence.
Expected return is the chance-weighted sum over all the cards, and the straight-parlay column is the same money on the product of every leg's price.
The UK full-cover mode prices a different, fixed structure on exactly 3 selections: 3 doubles, 1 treble and 3 up-and-down pairs (Single Stakes About), enumerated over the 8 ways 3 selections can settle rather than generalized over n. A double and the treble price exactly as in the combination mode above.
An up-and-down on selections i and j stakes s on each, and settles to 0 when neither wins, s(dI - 1) when only i wins, s(dJ - 1) when only j wins, and 2s(dI + dJ - 1) when both win, where dI and dJ are i and j's decimal odds.
That is the conditional-stake convention worked through to a closed form: i's stake pays out, and the original stake amount, not the return, goes straight on as a fresh single on j; the two directions (i first, j first) run independently and sum.
The ticket risks 10 units in total (1 each for the 3 doubles and the treble, 2 each for the 3 up-and-down pairs), and the same break-even and expected-value logic above applies to it once priced.
Common misreadings5
- The perfect-card figure is not what the ticket is expected to return. It is the one card a round robin is not bought for, and the page prints what share of the average return depends on it.
- A round robin does not turn a losing set of selections into a winning bet. Spreading the same legs across more parlays changes the shape of the outcome, not the sign of the edge: at real prices every configuration on this page returns less than it costs.
- Winning most of your legs is not the same as winning money, and the table exists to make that concrete rather than to be reassuring. Read the row one leg short of perfect before deciding the format is protection.
- A lower hold per dollar than the straight parlay does not make the round robin the better bet. It costs more in total, so a smaller percentage of a larger outlay can still be more money lost.
- The break-even leg count is not a forecast of how many legs will land. It is what your prices require, and how likely you are to get there is the separate figure printed beside it.
Assumptions7
- Selections are independent. Legs from the same game are not, and correlated legs make the middle rows of the table optimistic.
- Each leg is taken at the chance its own price implies, unless you enter fair odds for every leg, in which case yours are used. Implied chances make every parlay break even on average, which is the optimistic case rather than a neutral one: a real price carries a margin.
- Every parlay on the ticket carries the same stake, which is how books settle a round robin.
- All legs settle as a win or a loss. Pushes, voids and books that recalculate a parlay around a voided leg are not modeled.
- Prices are the ones you entered and hold for the whole ticket. A book that shortens a price between placing the parlays is a real cost this page does not see.
- Between 3 and 8 selections. Two selections have exactly one combination, which is a straight parlay written the long way, and above 8 the ticket is past what books take.
- The UK full-cover mode assumes one 'if cash' convention: an up-and-down's conditional single is always funded and placed, whatever the state of the leg that triggers it. Bookmakers vary on this in practice, and Double Stakes About is a related, separate structure this calculator does not price. See the evidence note for the source this implements.
Limits6
- The independence assumption is the big one, and its direction is knowable: correlated legs land together more often than these prices imply, so a ticket built from one game returns more than this table shows on its good cards and the same on its bad ones. How much more needs a correlation estimate this page does not have.
- The chances on every row are only as good as the prices they come from. An implied chance carries the bookmaker margin, so the table's probabilities are systematically kinder than the market's own view unless you supply fair odds.
- Expected value against fair odds is your read of the market, not a measured one. Nothing here estimates a fair price; the no-vig calculator is the usual way to get one out of a real market rather than out of a hunch.
- The tool prices the ticket, not the bankroll around it. A round robin's total outlay is several times its unit stake, which is a staking decision this page does not weigh in on.
- Books differ on what combination sizes they offer and on maximum payouts. A ceiling figure here can exceed what a book will actually pay on a large ticket.
- The UK full-cover mode's up-and-down settlement follows one named convention, not every bookmaker's own house rules. A shop that funds a conditional single differently, or settles Double Stakes About instead, prices differently from what this mode shows.
Evidence
Every number on this page is derived from the prices entered, and nothing is transcribed from a source: the parlay counts are combinatorics on the selections, and the returns and chances are a complete enumeration of the 2 to the power n ways the card can settle, written out in math.ts. math.test.ts pins the worked four-leg -110 example row by row, re-derives the parlay counts from the enumeration rather than asserting them, checks every card of a six-leg mixed ticket against a second and deliberately naive implementation, and asserts the invariant that catches an error anywhere in the enumeration: taken at their own implied chances every parlay is a fair bet, so the expected return has to be exactly the outlay for every configuration of prices, sizes and stakes.
The structure is also checked against a source that arrived at it independently: the round robin explainer published at https://www.foxsports.com/stories/betting/round-robin-betting-what-means-how-works, updated 2026-04-22 and retrieved 2026-09-10, gives the by-2s parlay counts for 3 to 6 selections and illustrates the one-selection-miss case for three selections, where one of the three parlays still collects, both of which this implementation reproduces without them being written into it.
The source does not extend that illustration to four selections; the three-of-six figure quoted above for that case is this module's own enumeration, pinned by its own test in math.test.ts and consistent with the monotonicity invariant asserted across the whole input space, rather than checked against an external source.
A passing test means the code matches the model, not that the model captures a correlated ticket or a book's own settlement rules.
The UK full-cover structure and its up-and-down convention are sourced separately: Wikipedia's Glossary of bets offered by UK bookmakers gives the 10-bet composition (3 doubles, 1 treble, 3 up-and-down bets) and describes an up-and-down as a Trixie with those three added, corroborated against two public UK bet calculators (AceOdds and Free-Bet-Calculator) rather than relied on alone.
The up-and-down's closed-form settlement is derived, not transcribed: it follows from the conditional-stake description by direct calculation, and math.test.ts checks it four ways, against a hand-worked all-evens example, against the exact BigInt combinatorics used for the up-and-down formula's own edge case (a lone winner breaking even only once its price reaches 3.00), against every card of an asymmetric-price ticket read off individually by settlement label, and as the same fair-at-implied-odds invariant the combination mode above is checked against, run over a spread of price triples rather than one.
Gambling can cause serious harm. The National Problem Gambling Helpline is free, confidential and open 24/7, call or text 1-800-MY-RESET (1-800-697-3738), or chat at ncpgambling.org/chat.
Related tools
Try next
- Parlay CalculatorPrice a multi-leg bet
- Expected Value CalculatorCheck if a price has value
- No-Vig Fair Odds CalculatorStrip the bookmaker's margin out of a market to see the fair price behind every outcome.
- Odds ConverterConvert odds to any format
- NFL Teaser CalculatorPrices a teaser by the specific numbers it crosses, not a flat payout table that cannot see it.